Lexus LX 2015 vs Mazda 6 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Lexus LX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 6 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Lexus LX is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.5 - 5.7 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 383 HP | 120 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 650 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 8.6 seconds | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | |
| In general, Lexus LX are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 15.9 | 5.2 - 8.0 | |
|
Lexus LX petrol engines consumes on average 7.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Lexus LX equipped with diesel engines consume 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Lexus LX is larger. Lexus LX is 31 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 19 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 47 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1267 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Lexus LX has 191 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 435 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`350 kg | ~ 2`021 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`510 kg | ~ 1`419 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 840 kg | ~ 602 kg | |
| Lexus LX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Mazda 6. Therefore, Lexus LX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 102 000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |
