Lexus LX 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.5 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Range Rover is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 383 HP | 249 - 565 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 650 NM | 450 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 8.6 seconds | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Lexus LX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 15.9 | 2.8 - 12.8 | |
|
Lexus LX petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, Lexus LX equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | 212 - 297 mm (8.3 - 11.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.87 m | |
| Lexus LX is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 639 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1267 litres | 1943 litres | |
| Lexus LX has 62 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 676 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`350 kg | ~ 3`157 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`510 kg | ~ 2`379 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 840 kg | ~ 778 kg | |
| Lexus LX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem more than Land Rover Range Rover. Therefore, Lexus LX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 102 000 | 94 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |