Lexus LS 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 2003

 
Lexus LS
2003 - 2006
Jaguar XJ
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.3 Petrol4.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 282 HP300 HP
Torque: 417 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds6.6 seconds
Lexus LS engine produces 18 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Despite less power, Lexus LS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.410.9
Lexus LS consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LS could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 84 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1040 km on highway
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.09 m
Width: 1.83 m1.86 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LS is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 570 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 1.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Lexus LS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`340 kg1`900 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 80008800
Pros and Cons: Lexus LS has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Jaguar XJ has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv