Lexus LS 2006 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 380 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 493 NM | 257 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Lexus LS is more dynamic to drive. Lexus LS engine produces 187 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 236 NM more than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Lexus LS reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.0 | |
Lexus LS consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LS could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LS engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 18 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300M, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Intrepid | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.15 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
Lexus LS is 13 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus LS is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 509 litres | 504 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
Lexus LS has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Lexus LS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`515 | 2`170 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |