Lexus LS 2009 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 498 NM | 257 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Lexus LS engine produces 187 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 241 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 11.0 | |
|
The Lexus LS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Lexus LS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LS engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300M, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Intrepid | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
| Lexus LS has 6 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |