Lexus LS 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 290 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Lexus LS is more dynamic to drive. Lexus LS engine produces 10 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, but torque is 14 NM more than Jaguar XJ. Despite less power, Lexus LS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.9 | |
|
The Lexus LS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Lexus LS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LS is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Lexus LS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`330 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
| |