Lexus LS 2000 vs Lexus LS 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 290 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Lexus LS 2000 and Lexus LS 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.6 | |
|
The Lexus LS 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS 2000 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LS 2000 could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus LS 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS 2000 is 2 cm shorter than the Lexus LS 2003, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 571 litres | 570 litres | |
| Lexus LS 2000 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LS 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS 2000 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Lexus LS 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Lexus LS has
| |