Lexus LS 2017 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 421 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Lexus LS is more dynamic to drive. Lexus LS engine produces 241 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Lexus LS reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 4.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LS could require 840 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LS engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.24 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Lexus LS is 28 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus LS has 60 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the Lexus LS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Lexus LS can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 65 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |