Lexus LS 2000 vs Mazda 626 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Lexus LS is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 626 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Lexus LS is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 281 - 290 HP | 76 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 417 - 434 NM | 157 - 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 12.1 | 6.8 - 9.6 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Lexus LS is larger. Lexus LS is 30 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 8 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LS is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 571 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage capacity. Lexus LS has 116 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |