Lexus LS 2000 vs Lexus LS 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 281 - 290 HP | 282 - 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 417 - 434 NM | 417 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.1 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 12.1 | 8.6 - 11.4 | |
|
Lexus LS 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS 2000 is 2 cm shorter than the Lexus LS 2003, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 571 litres | 570 litres | |
| Lexus LS 2000 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LS 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS 2000 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Lexus LS 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Lexus LS has
| |