Lexus LS 2003 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus LS is available only with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 - 290 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 417 - 434 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 6.3 seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.4 | 8.1 - 14.0 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Lexus LS and Chrysler 300C are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage capacity. Lexus LS has 66 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 1.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Lexus LS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`335 | ~ 2`269 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |