Lexus LS 2003 vs Lexus LS 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus LS 2003 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Lexus LS 2006 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 | 4.6 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 - 290 HP | 367 - 445 HP | |
| Torque: | 417 - 434 NM | 469 - 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 6.3 seconds | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.4 | 9.3 - 11.6 | |
|
Lexus LS 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Lexus LS 2003 is smaller. Lexus LS 2003 is 6 cm shorter than the Lexus LS 2006, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 565 litres | |
| Lexus LS 2003 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LS 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS 2003 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Lexus LS 2006, which means Lexus LS 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`335 | ~ 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Lexus LS has
| |