Lexus LS 2003 vs Jaguar XJR 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Lexus LS
2003 - 2006
Jaguar XJR
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: Automatic Manual
Engines: 4.34.2

Performance

Power: 282 - 290 HP395 HP
Torque: 417 - 434 NM540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 - 6.3 seconds5.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.6 - 11.412.1
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJR.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.02 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.31 m
Lexus LS and Jaguar XJR are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 570 litres430 litres
Lexus LS has more luggage capacity.
Lexus LS has 140 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XJR.
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`335~ 2`263
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6200no data
Pros and Cons: Lexus LS has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv