Lexus LS 2006 vs Lexus LS 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Lexus LS 2006 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Lexus LS 2003 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 367 - 445 HP | 282 - 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 469 - 520 NM | 417 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | 6.1 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.6 | 8.6 - 11.4 | |
|
Lexus LS 2006 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Lexus LS 2006 is larger. Lexus LS 2006 is 6 cm longer than the Lexus LS 2003, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 570 litres | |
| Lexus LS 2006 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS 2006 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Lexus LS 2003, which means Lexus LS 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`620 | ~ 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Lexus LS has
| |