Lexus LS 2009 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Lexus LS is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Malibu has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Lexus LS is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Malibu can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 | 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 367 - 445 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 466 - 520 NM | 225 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 9.5 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 10.2 | 7.8 - 8.0 | |
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Malibu. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.06 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
Lexus LS is larger. Lexus LS is 20 cm longer than the Chevrolet Malibu, 2 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LS is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 545 litres | |
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus LS has 35 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. This could mean that the Lexus LS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`640 | ~ 1`539 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |