Lexus LS 2012 vs Chrysler 300C 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 370 - 394 HP | 239 - 470 HP | |
| Torque: | 473 - 520 NM | 340 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | 5.4 - 7.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.6 | 9.5 - 12.6 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Lexus LS is 11 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 462 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 465 litres | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage capacity. Lexus LS has 48 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`582 | ~ 2`387 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |