Lexus LS 2012 vs Mercedes S class 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 370 - 394 HP | 235 - 525 HP | |
Torque: | 473 - 520 NM | 350 - 830 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | 4.6 - 7.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.6 | 7.6 - 14.4 | |
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes S class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.16 m | 5.15 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes S class, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus LS is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 560 litres | |
Mercedes S class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus LS has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes S class. This could mean that the Lexus LS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes S class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`582 | ~ 2`618 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 28 600 | 13 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes S klase has
| |