Lexus LS 2012 vs Mercedes S class 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 5.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 370 - 394 HP | 258 - 585 HP | |
| Torque: | 473 - 520 NM | 620 - 900 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | 4 - 6.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.6 | 5.9 - 10.3 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes S class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes S class, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LS is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 530 litres | |
| Lexus LS has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes S class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes S class, which means Lexus LS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`582 | ~ 2`689 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 58 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Mercedes S klase has
| |