Lexus LS 2012 vs Lexus LS 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 4.6 - 5.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 370 - 394 HP | 367 - 445 HP | |
| Torque: | 473 - 520 NM | 469 - 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.6 | 9.3 - 11.6 | |
|
Lexus LS 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS 2012 is 8 cm longer than the Lexus LS 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Lexus LS 2006 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus LS 2012 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS 2006. This could mean that the Lexus LS 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`582 | ~ 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Lexus LS has
| |