Lexus LS 2012 vs Chrysler 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Lexus LS is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 370 - 394 HP | 173 - 287 HP | |
| Torque: | 473 - 520 NM | 225 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | 6.5 - 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.6 | 8.1 - 10.2 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Lexus LS is larger, but slightly lower. Lexus LS is 29 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 3 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LS is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage capacity. Lexus LS has 120 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Lexus LS can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`582 | ~ 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |