Lexus LS 2017 vs Jaguar XJR 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Lexus LS is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XJR can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.5 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 421 HP | 575 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 6.5 seconds | 4.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 9.9 | 11.1 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.24 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Lexus LS is larger, but slightly lower. Lexus LS is 11 cm longer than the Jaguar XJR, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus LS is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJR has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus LS has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJR. This could mean that the Lexus LS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`675 | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Jaguar XJR has
| |