Lexus LC 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus LC is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 477 HP | 238 - 650 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 365 - 868 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 seconds | 4.2 - 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 8.2 - 15.7 | |
|
Lexus LC petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LC is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 197 litres | 257 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Lexus LC has 60 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LC is 0.8 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Lexus LC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`375 | ~ 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LC has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |