Lexus IS 2002 vs Seat Toledo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lexus IS) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Seat Toledo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Lexus IS is more dynamic to drive. Lexus IS engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 125 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Lexus IS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
| Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 5.9 | |
| The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus IS consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus IS could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Lexus IS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.57 m | |
| Lexus IS is 4 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus IS is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down | 475 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus IS is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Lexus IS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: | Lexus IS has 
 | Seat Toledo has 
 | |
