Lexus GX 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 525 HP | |
| Torque: | 438 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Lexus GX engine produces 229 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 187 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Lexus GX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 12.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 104 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus GX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Land Cruiser, Lexus GS, Toyota Tundra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus GX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus GX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Lexus GX is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus GX is 12 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus GX is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 639 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 621 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 639 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1832 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus GX is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Lexus GX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 112 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |