Lexus GX 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Lexus GX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus GX engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 105 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Lexus GX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 13.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus GX consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus GX could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Lexus GX is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm wider, while the height of Lexus GX is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 8 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1238 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1238 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2513 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus GX (by 723 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus GX is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Lexus GX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`800 kg | 3`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`150 kg | 2`215 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 650 kg | 1`085 kg | |
| Lexus GX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 67 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GX has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |