Lexus GX 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.6 | 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 301 HP | 249 - 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 296 - 438 NM | 346 - 475 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 6.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 - 13.8 | 11.0 - 12.3 | |
|
Lexus GX petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Lexus GX is smaller, but higher. Lexus GX is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus GX is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1832 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus GX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus GX has 26 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`992 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Explorer has
| |