Lexus GX 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.6 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 13.5 | |
|
Lexus GX petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Lexus GX is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1833 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1833 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus GX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus GX has 1170 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`948 | ~ 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GX has
|
| |