Lexus ES 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Lexus ES engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 238 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Lexus ES reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 4.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus ES consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus ES could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Lexus ES) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.98 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Lexus ES is 2 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus ES is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus ES has 68 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the Lexus ES uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar XF has
| |