Lexus ES 2016 vs Lexus ES 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Lexus ES 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus ES 2016 engine produces 34 HP less power than Lexus ES 2012, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Lexus ES 2012. Due to the lower power, Lexus ES 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.9 | |
|
The Lexus ES 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus ES 2016 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus ES 2012, which means that by driving the Lexus ES 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus ES 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus ES 2016 and Lexus ES 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Lexus ES has
| |