Lexus ES 2001 vs Volvo S80 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus ES engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Lexus ES reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.6 | |
| Lexus ES consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Lexus ES over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
| Lexus ES is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus ES is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Volvo S80 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus ES uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S80 has
| |