Lexus ES 2012 vs Jaguar XJ 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Lexus ES engine produces 56 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Lexus ES reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Lexus ES is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus ES consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Lexus ES over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Lexus ES) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Lexus ES is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus ES is 22 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus ES is 0.9 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Lexus ES can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |