Lexus ES 2016 vs Lexus ES 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Lexus ES 2012 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 249 HP | 161 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 346 NM | 213 - 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.6 seconds | 7.4 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.5 | 5.4 - 9.5 | |
|
Lexus ES 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus ES 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 151 - 152 mm (5.9 - 6 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus ES 2016 and Lexus ES 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 2`127 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Lexus ES has
| |