Lexus ES 2016 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus ES is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 249 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 346 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.6 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.5 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Lexus ES petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 151 - 152 mm (5.9 - 6 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
| Lexus ES is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus ES is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 463 litres | |
| Lexus ES has 3 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus ES is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Lexus ES can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |