Lexus ES 2006 vs Lexus RX 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus ES is available only with front wheel drive, while Lexus RX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 3.0 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 204 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 242 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 7.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 - 12.2 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.68 m | |
| Lexus ES is 11 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus ES is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | 2130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`422 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Lexus RX has
| |