Lexus ES 2010 vs Jaguar XJ 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Lexus ES is available with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XJ can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jaguar XJ is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 HP | 240 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 340 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.0 - 12.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Lexus ES is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus ES is 30 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage space. Lexus ES has 105 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`346 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |