Lexus ES 2012 vs Lexus ES 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Lexus ES 2012 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 - 277 HP | 150 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 346 NM | 199 - 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.8 seconds | 7.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.5 | 6.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Lexus ES 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus ES 2016. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 151 - 152 mm (5.9 - 6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus ES 2012 and Lexus ES 2016 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`127 | ~ 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Lexus ES has
| |