Lexus ES 2012 vs Jaguar XJ 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Lexus ES is available with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XJ can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 - 277 HP | 240 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 346 NM | 340 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.8 seconds | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.5 | 7.0 - 12.1 | |
|
Lexus ES petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Lexus ES is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus ES is 28 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage space. Lexus ES has 60 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus ES is 1.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Lexus ES can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`127 | ~ 2`346 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus ES has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |