Lexus CT 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus CT engine produces 23 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus CT is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Lexus CT has 51 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 515 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |