Lexus CT 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Lexus CT engine produces 21 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite less power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Lexus CT consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Lexus CT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo V40 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus CT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus CT is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Lexus CT has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 515 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |