Lexus CT 2018 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Lexus CT engine produces 91 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Lexus CT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Lexus CT consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Lexus CT consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Lexus CT is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1237 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus CT has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Lexus CT uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Lexus CT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |