Lexus CT 2018 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Lexus CT engine produces 91 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Lexus CT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Lexus CT consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Lexus CT consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus CT 2018 1.8 engine: The Toyota 2ZR-FXE is a 1.8-liter gasoline engine produced since 2009 and designed specifically for Toyota hybrid powertrains. It is based on the conventional 2ZR-FE but adapted for hybrid operation, prioritizing efficiency rather than outright performance. The engine is very economical and, with ... More about Lexus CT 2018 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Lexus CT is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1237 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus CT uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Lexus CT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`790 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`429 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 370 kg | 561 kg | |
| Lexus CT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 52 procentiem less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Therefore, Volkswagen T-Roc is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |