Lexus CT 2011 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus CT is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo V40 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Lexus CT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Lexus CT petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Lexus CT is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus CT is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
985 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Lexus CT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`845 kg | ~ 1`976 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`410 kg | ~ 1`369 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 435 kg | ~ 607 kg | |
| Lexus CT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem less than Volvo V40. Therefore, Volvo V40 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |