Lexus CT 2011 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Lexus CT is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 99 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
Lexus CT petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
Lexus CT is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus CT is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Lexus CT has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Lexus CT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`845 | ~ 1`976 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 9000 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |