Lexus CT 2018 vs Renault Megane 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus CT is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Renault Megane has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 90 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 5.7 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.7 - 8.1 | |
|
Lexus CT petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Lexus CT is smaller. Lexus CT and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Lexus CT has 32 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 1.4 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Lexus CT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`790 | ~ 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Renault Megane has
| |