Lexus CT 2018 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Lexus CT is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen T-Roc has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus CT is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen T-Roc can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen T-Roc is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 110 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 4.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen T-Roc are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Lexus CT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Lexus CT petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Roc. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen T-Roc can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Lexus CT is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
985 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus CT uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 305 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Lexus CT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`844 kg | ~ 1`945 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`420 kg | ~ 1`402 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 424 kg | ~ 543 kg | |
| Lexus CT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Therefore, Volkswagen T-Roc is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |