Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |