Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 47 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.9 | 15.6 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |