Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1993 - 1994
Land Rover Range Rover
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.2 Petrol4.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 203 HP396 HP
Torque: 340 NM560 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds7.5 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 engine produces 193 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover 2005, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover 2005. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover 1993 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.916.0
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover 1993 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 500 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.95 m
Width: 1.82 m1.96 m
Height: 1.79 m1.82 m
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is smaller.
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 30 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data535 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2005.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 98007400
Pros and Cons:
    Land Rover Range Rover has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv