Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 396 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 560 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover 1993 engine produces 193 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover 2005, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover 2005. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover 1993 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.9 | 16.0 | |
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover 1993 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.96 m | |
Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 30 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2005. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |