Land Rover Range Rover 1988 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 279 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 24 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 14.6 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 440 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |