Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Ford Maverick 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | 19.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.099999999999998 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.1 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |