Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.3 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover 1993 engine produces 61 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover 2005, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover 2005. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover 1993 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 11.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover 1993 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover 1993 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover 2005 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover 1993 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover 2005 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 47 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 1993 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |