Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 49 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 36 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 832 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1368 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |